P2 How God is the explanation of the universe - Clarifications and Applications

Acts 17:17-19  "So he was reasoning in the synagogue with the Jews and the God-fearing Gentiles, and in the market place every day with those who happened to be present. 18 And also some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers were conversing with him. Some were saying, “What wouldthis idle babbler wish to say?” Others, “He seems to be a proclaimer of strange deities,”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. 19 And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching iswhich you are proclaiming?"

Introduction:

In yesterday's post we considered how Christian apologetics utilizes logical arguments in demonstrating its truth claims. We further presented a classical argument for God's existence that aimed at establishing how God is the explanation of the universe. Today's post will take the time to tease out the argument and why the argument is practically relevant to you. 

A sample argument for how God is the explanation of the universe

With the idea of logical arguments explained, we can now consider a particular argument for God's existence that deals with how he is the explanation for the universe. Keeping in mind what we learned about what comprises a good sound, valid argument, we can offer the following argument as originally conceived by the 18th century mathematician G.W.F Leibniz:

Premise #1: Everything that exists has an explanation for its existence

Premise #2: If the universe has an explanation for its existence, that explanation is God

Premise #3: The universe exists

Premise #4: The universe has an explanation for its existence

Premise #5: The explanation for the universe is God

Therefore: God exists

Now let's look at this argument. Premise #3 is virtually without controversy, since almost no one would deny that the universe exists. Something as simple as looking up at the night sky can confirm this fact. so, premise #3 is the easiest premise to prove. Premises #1 & #2 are typically the most attacked premises. Concerning premise #1, athiests and skeptics will either say that the universe is simply "there" and has no need for explanation or that if God would exist, He Himself would need to have an explanation for His existence. The typical response to this first objection is to point out that God is a being Who must exist by necessity in any possible description of reality. The universe, however, does not have to exist, since it began a finite time ago. To say that the universe simply "popped into being" out of nothing doesn't make sense, and thus the universe needed to have a Cause that was greater and different than it and more importantly, possessing a Free Will and Personality. Thus concerning Premise #1, the objection leads us to reinforce, not reject, the truth of the claim: "Everything that exists has an explanation for its existence, whether by necessity of its own nature (i.e God) or by an external cause (i.e something or Someone causing the universe). 

Premise #2 is typically objected by Atheists too, since it sounds like the argument is simply asserting that if the universe has an explanation for its existence, then that explanation must be God. However, what the Atheist doesn't realize is that their own take on the universe is that on atheism, the universe has no explanation for its existence. The athiest will typically try to formulate their own response to premise #2: "If athiesm is true, then the universe has no explanation for its existence." Furthermore, in trying to assert this premise, the athiest is forming an argument that is logically equivalent to the original premise of the universe having an explanation for its existence, and that explanation being God. Either both premises will be true or false, but one cannot be true and the other false, nor vice-versa. To say that the universe doesn't have an explanation is in fact an explanation! There are other points that could be brought out to demonstrate why the athiest objection won't hold water, but for now we can rest sufficiently in the soundness of premises #1-2, which state again:

Premise #1: Everything that exists has an explanation for its existence

Premise #2: If the universe has an explanation for its existence, that explanation is God

Premise #3, as we've already noted, is virtually without question: "The universe exists

With premises #1-#3 established, the fourth premise then states: "The universe has an explanation for its existence", with premise #5 reading: "The explanation for the universe is God". Without going into further detailed explanation, if the reader considers how we worked through the first three premises, premise #4 logically progresses from those first three and premise #5 serves to clarify everything argued for and demonstrated in premises #1-#4.

Therefore, with premises#1-#5 demonstrated to be true and valid, the conclusion naturally follows: "Therefore, God exists". 

So why does this matter to you?

When we consider the above argument for God's existence, why does it matter? With God being the explanation for the universe, that means He is also the explanation for life and humanity. Humanity's quest for significance (i.e meaning); morality (i.e values) and goal for living (i.e purpose) must have a grounding in one of two things: either the universe or God. People who believe that they determine meaning, values and purpose or that the universe has somehow programmed people to desire such have opted for grounding the explanation for everything in the universe. But as we've already observed, the universe exists not because it has to, but because it was caused by God who by nature must exist. God is therefore the proper ground for understanding meaning, value and purpose. As the Apostle Paul will aim to argue, unless one's apologetic leads the listener from the existence of God to the Person and work of Jesus, the apologetic task will not be achieved. Thus, this is why the idea of "God being the explanation of the universe" is so practical and true.  

P1 How God is the explanation of the universe - A powerful argument for God's existence

Acts 17:17-19 "So he was reasoning in the synagogue with the Jews and the God-fearing Gentiles, and in the market place every day with those who happened to be present. 18 And also some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers were conversing with him. Some were saying, “What wouldthis idle babbler wish to say?” Others, “He seems to be a proclaimer of strange deities,”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. 19 And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching is which you are proclaiming?"

Introduction:

Today's post is going to talk about a particular argument for God's existence that demonstrates how he alone is the explanation for the universe. Now before we press on, let me just say a word about arguments and apologetics. When we talk about apologetics, we are referring to that branch of Christian theology at aims to give valid reasons or "warrant" for the truth claims of Christianity. Another way of wording this definition would be to say: "explaining why we believe what we believe". 

As one reads the above opening verses, it appears that the Apostle Paul had his work cut out for him in facing the objections of the skeptical crowd in Athens. What Paul would begin to do is offer reasons and arguments for God's existence, with His final remarks reserved for demonstrating the specific reality of Jesus' resurrection from the dead. What we see Paul doing here in Acts 17 gives us precedence for doing apologetics and for using logical arguments for God's existence. Today's post will feature a particular argument as to why God is the explanation for the universe.

How logical arguments function in apologetics

A key method in executing the apologetic task is by way of what we call logical arguments. An "argument" is not being used here to in the sense of getting into a verbal shouting match with one's opponent. Rather, an argument is a form of reason that attempts to connect certain statements (or premises) to a concluding statement (or conclusion). If the premises of a given logical argument are true (that is, sound) and formulated correctly (that is, valid), then the conclusion necessarily follows and therefore one has a sound valid argument. 

Logical arguments are important in apologetics due to the accusation non-Christians make about Christian people being irrational and unreasonable. Faith and reason fit like hand-in-glove. As one writer said long ago: "Our faith is a faith seeking understanding". 

A sample logical argument

An example of a general logical argument (technically called a 'deductive argument', because it deduces the conclusion by going from general to specific information) may go something like this:

Premise #1: All men are mortal

Premise #2: George Washington is a man

Therefore: George Washington is mortal

The above argument contains two premises and a conclusion. According to the laws of logic, the argument is validly constructed - hence the argument is valid. Concerning whether or not the premises are true can be established by consulting science and history. We know that in premise #1, as basic scientific fact is that all men do die. Concerning premise #2, George Washington was a man who lived and was the first President of the United States. According to historical documents, George Washington was born February 22, 1732 and died December 14, 1799. So in this sample argument, we have historical and scientific evidence to demonstrate that premises #1 and #2 correspond to reality and thus are true. Whenever we have a valid and sound argument like the one above, the conclusion must follow. And therefore, we can conclude that George Washington was indeed a mortal man. 

A sample argument for how God is the explanation of the universe

With the idea of logical arguments explained, we can now consider a particular argument for God's existence that deals with how he is the explanation for the universe. Keeping in mind what we learned about what comprises a good sound, valid argument, we can offer the following argument as originally conceived by the 18th century mathematician G.W.F Leibniz:

Premise #1: Everything that exists has an explanation for its existence

Premise #2: If the universe has an explanation for its existence, that explanation is God

Premise #3: The universe exists

Premise #4: The universe has an explanation for its existence

Premise #5: The explanation for the universe is God

Therefore: God exists

In tomorrow's post we will further explanations this argument and draw out some life-practical applications for the reader. More tomorrow...

Three expectations to have when doing apologetics

Acts 17:4-5 "And some of them were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, along with a large number of the God-fearing Greeks and a number of the leading women. 5 But the Jews, becoming jealous and taking along some wicked men from the market place, formed a mob and set the city in an uproar; and attacking the house of Jason, they were seeking to bring them out to the people."

Today's post answers the question: "what to expect when doing Christian apologetics?" When we consider apologetics, the task involves giving reasons as to why we believe what we believe about the truth claims of Christianity. This task can be likened unto a farmer plowing the field and breaking up the fallow ground for reception of seed. Apologetics and it's closely related cousin of evangelism overlap and interlock. Evangelism has been defined as presenting the Gospel of Jesus Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit and leaving the results up to God. So, much like evangelism, the common fears of rejection accompany the efforts of apologetics. Certainly the Apostle Paul had his fair share of responses. In Acts 17 we can discern three expectations one should have when engaging in the work of apologetics. Such expectations can equally be applied to evangelism, preaching or teaching Sunday School. Notice....

1. Expect rejection. Acts 17:4, 10-12

The very thing all Christians is true - "rejection" - must be assumed and not denied. Despite common objections, ridicule and mockery; Christians have the duty and obligation to give reasons for the hope that is within them (1 Peter 3:15). The Jews who opposed Paul in his missionary journeys through Macedonia followed him. Such opposition may on the surface seem only to impede and destroy the apologist in their efforts. However, God uses both good and bad circumstances and intentions to guide as where we need to go. Paul's rejection in Thessalonica moved him onto the major apologetic encounter he would have in Athens near the end of Acts 17. So expect rejection, however also expect....

2. Expect conversions. Acts 17:10-12

I wanted to reserve this expection as the second point to get the inevitable negative expectation of rejection out of the way. Is not the point of apologetics and evangelism to prayerfully see the Holy Spirit use our presentation to bring about the conversion of sinners? Now when I say "conversions", I must hasten to add that conversions may take time. 

I recall ministering among Muslims years ago. Roughly 30 of us had engaged in public meetings for better understanding with Muslims for two years. Although we saw no converts, we did see a few intellectual objections wither. Apologetics requires patience and prayer. Eventually, there will be conversions. As Paul traveled throughout the Greco-Roman pagan infused world of Macedonia, he did see people convert to Jesus Christ. Again, despite the opposition, such antagonism served as a backdrop to bring into sharp relief the integrity of Paul and his companions in their apologetical task. Sometimes God can use our lives, as well as our arguments to convince unbelievers that what we believe gives confidence in the face of opposition. So, when doing Christian apologetics, expect rejection and expect conversions. But there is one more expectiation...

3. Expect God to use you in both. 

We read in Acts 17:14-16 "Then immediately the brethren sent Paul out to go as far as the sea; and Silas and Timothy remained there. 15 Now those who escorted Paul brought him as far as Athens; and receiving a command for Silas and Timothy to come to him as soon as possible, they left.
16 Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was being provoked within him as he was observing the city full of idols." The one thing we learn about God's Sovereignty is that in His exercise of it among people and circumstances (such an exercise of sovereignty is also called God's providence), God is a very strategic God. What resulted from the combined rejection and reception of Paul's apologetic efforts? God used him and God moved Paul to where He needed him to be. On the ground level it may had appeared that Paul was running into walls and running in circles. However, God was strategically and providentially moving Paul down the entire length of the Macedonian region. 

If we can keep in mind that God can use anyone with a willing heart and a big view of Him, then no matter what happens, the expectation of being used by Him will overrule the discouragement from rejection and reinforce patience in prayerfully waiting for conversions. 

What is necessary for doing Christian apologetics?

Acts 17:1-3 Now when they had traveled through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. 2 And according to Paul’s custom, he went to them, and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures, 3 explaining and giving evidence that the Christ had to suffer and rise again from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you is the Christ.”

Introduction:

Today's post answers the question: "what is involved in Christian apologetics?" Dr. William Lane Craig defines apologetics as: "The discipline in Christian theology that entails giving reasonable warrant for holding to the truth claims of Christianity". When Dr. Craig speaks of "reasonable warrant", he is referring to justifying why one believes what they believe. Certainly the Apostle Paul had a mission to go into the regions of Europe - particularly Macedonia - so as to lay the ground work for evangelism. As a plowman prepares a field for reception of seed, apologetics sculpts furrows and rows in the culture for what will be the sowing of Gospel seed in evangelism. God had called Paul by way of vision to journey to Macedonia and engage the people of ancient Europe. Paul would eventually make his way down the region of Macedonia that included key cities such as Philippi and the larger cities referenced in the passage above. The more familar cities of Thessalonica and Corinth would also be included in this missionary journey. Eventually this trip would lead to one of the most dramatic apologetic encounters occurring at the famous "Mars Hill" - an ancient think- tank of philosophers and thinkers in Athens. 

In the opening verses of today's post, we see Paul's method of apologetical groundwork as he entered in new territory. What were the essentials of Paul's apologetical method and message? Note the following thoughts from Acts 17:1-4:

1. A consistent method Acts 17:1-2a

As a general rule, Paul always bee-lined to the Synagogues (Jewish meeting-places) in keeping with the early church's mission of the "Jew first, and also the Greek" (Acts 1:8; Romans 1:16). The word translated "custom" speaks of Paul's "habit". A good apologist will have a method, an outline and overall goal in mind as they do their preparatory work for evangelism. An example of a consistent method may very well be in offering common arguments for God's existence, followed by demonstrating the reliability of the Bible and ending with the credibility of the fact of Jesus' resurrection from the dead. Such a method, called "classical apologetics", has existed in one form or another since the early days of the church following the death of the apostles. 

2. A communication of worldviews.

Acts 17:2b

Luke writes in Acts 17:2b that Paul "reasoned from the scriptures" with the Jews. The Greek word translated "reasoned" is a verb from whence we derive our English word "dialogue". Thus as Paul spoke in the Synagogue, or later on with the Graeco-Roman audiences, his aim was to engage these people in dialogue. Creating an atmosphere of having "meetings for better clarity" can go a long way toward removing caricatures that Christians and non-Christians bring into the apologetical discussion. Moreover, as non-Christians are given the opportunity to dialogue with Christians, inroads are opened up for the Holy Spirit to do His convicting work (John 16:8-12). Think of how often Jesus Himself had conversations with people. In apologetics, building relationships is essential if we ever expect to see eventual conversions.  

3. Constructing evidence and arguments for why one believes the truth claims of Christianity

Luke then goes further by stating in Acts 17:2b-3 reasoned with them from the Scriptures, 3 explaining and giving evidence that the Christ had to suffer and rise again from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you is the Christ.” The two underlined English words detail what Paul did as he laid out the case for Christianity. 

First, the word "explaining" comes from a word that refers to "opening up the meaning" of the text of scripture. We could also say that Paul's intent was to hopefully "open the minds" of his hearers. Undoubtedly there had been much prayer invested in this endeavor, since much like preaching, apologetics will never succeed apart from the Holy Spirit's intervention. 

The second word describing Paul's apologetic effort is the term "explaining". This word in the original language gives the idea of "laying out each argument or bit of evidence side by side". I'm sure the reader has seen court cases on television where lawyers will have "exhibit A" and "exhibit B" and so on. To establish guilt or innocence is done by cumulatively present each individual piece of evidence to make the overall case. In legal settings, the gold standard of establishing truth is "beyond a reasonable doubt". 

In apologetical situations, the normal standards include "plausibility" and "greatest level of probability, given the evidence." Apologetical arguments on their own do not constitute enough persuasive power to deliver certainty. Now even though that may sound disconcerting at first, the point of apologetics is to dislodge intellectual and moral objections and to move the unbeliever from outright hostility to reasonable consideration of the Christian faith. Whatever distance may remain between, say, intellectual acceptance of Christianity to full certain faith in Jesus Christ can only be bridged by the Holy Spirit and the scriptures (James 1:18; 1 Peter 1:23). 

Apologetics functions to prepare the mind and heart of the unbeliever for what will be the presentation of the Gospel. It may take only one apologetical encounter, or one may not even get through the whole presentation before the person says they're ready to believe. Again, the Holy Spirit is the One who brings people to point of certainty in saving faith (James 1:18; Hebrews 11:1). 

Conclusion:

So, what is involved in doing Christian apologetics? In exploring Acts 17:1-3, we saw that the Apostle Paul had three major elements: consistency, communication and construction. He was consistent in his approach and methodology. He aimed for two-way communication between himself and those whom he brought forth the case for Christianity. As we already noted, the task of Christian apologetics must be conjoined to the Person and work of the Holy Spirit and prayer. Then finally, he had constructed arguments and evidence that gave justification for why he believed why he believed. 

The appropriateness and duty of Christian apologetics

Acts 17:1-3 "Now when they had traveled through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came toThessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. 2 And according to Paul’s custom, he went to them, and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures, 3 explaining and giving evidence that the Christ had to suffer andrise again from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you is the Christ.”

Introduction:
In today's opening verses we see the Apostle Paul engaging in the practice of explaining and defending the Christian faith. Such an activity of defending and communicating the Christian faith is what we call "apologetics". The word "apologetics" derives from a Greek word ("apologia") that refers to Christians giving "a reasonable defense" or "giving an answer" as to why they have their hope in Jesus Christ. The Apostle Peter uses this word "apologia" (translated in most English translations by words such as "defense" or "answer") in 1 Peter 3:15 "but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence." 

The appropriateness and duty of Christian apologetics
Some Christians today will raise the question as to whether it is appropriate to do apologetics, since no one can "argue" anyone into the kingdom of God. The urgency expressed by Peter ought to put the matter to rest, since scripture asserts not only the appropriateness but duty for defending the Christian faith against doubt, opposing worldviews and hostile critics. 

Certainly engaging in apologetics with "gentleness and reverence" ensures that Christians won't lose their testimony and integrity. It can be very easy to get angry against mockers who ridicule Christianity. This blogger has engaged in apologetic work for over two decades, engaging with many non-Christian belief systems from atheism to agnosticism to Islam to Mormonism and more. The temptation to be hostile can rear its ugly head (and has certainly been experienced from time to time by this writer). The reminder from 1 Peter 3:15 expresses the truth that in as much as reasons are necessary for doing apologetics, the heart and the attitude of the apologist are equally important. 

Why apologetics must include conversation
When we see the Apostle Paul in Acts 17, we find that his typical strategy was to first engage the Jews in their gathering places of worship (called Synagogues) by "reasoning with them" from the scriptures. Later on in the same chapter, Paul is carrying on an apologetic conversation with the Greek Philosophers on Mars Hill. In Acts 17:17-18 "So he was reasoning in the synagogue with the Jews and the God-fearing Gentiles, and in the market place every day with those who happened to be present. 18 And also some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers were conversing with him. Some were saying, “What would this idle babbler wish to say?” Others, “He seems to be a proclaimer of strange deities,”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection." Paul exercised "reasoning" or quite literally "dialogue" with those who questioned and opposed the Christian faith, whether in conversation with the Jews or the Gentiles. Apologetics is not merely a one-way communique whereby one person does the talking and the other listens with no chance to raise further questions. The idea of "reasoning" carries with it a two-way exchange, a "dialogue" with an intended purpose.

Apologetics is still a worthwhile effort despite possible rejection
Both the Apostles Paul and Peter demonstrate that apologetics is appropriate in sharing the Gospel. Some today may still object in noting that very few people are won to Christ by arguments. Certainly our arguments and preaching won't win anyone on their own, since the Holy Spirit is the Agent who is responsible for bringing about the results. Nonetheless, the Holy Spirit uses "means" to achieve the conversion of sinners. We see in Acts 17 that although many people did end up mocking Paul, some did believe. We read in Acts 17:31-33 "Now when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some began to sneer, but others said, “We shall hear you again concerning this.” 33 So Paul went out of their midst. 34 But some men joined him and believed, among whom also were Dionysius the Areopagite and a woman named Damaris and others with them."

Conclusion: Christians need to be more about the task of Christian apologetics
So may we as Christians learn apologetical arguments, read apologetics books and explore the same-said websites and podcasts. Then, let's take those opportunities that God grants to give reasons as to why we believe. A few websites will be listed to encourage the Christian reader to apply what was written in this post today:

1. http://www.reasonablefaith.org/
2. http://rzim.org/
3. https://answersingenesis.org/

How you can tell when God is working in your prayer-life

1 John 5:15 "And if we know that He hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have the requests which we have asked from Him."

Introduction: A story about a misplaced bag

I recently had the experience of having my luggage being forgotten by the airliner at a certain stopover while on my way to a certain state. Whenever you travel a long way from home, you never realize how important the basics of life really are until you are without them. The bag that had been left at the certain airport contained clothes and personal effects. When I had gotten off of the final flight and waited at the baggage claim, I soon realized that the bag had been left at the previous airport. So, I went to the baggage claim counter and put in a request, with the clerk giving me a claim number. The only thing they could do was ensure me that the bag would be delivered by hand in the next day or so. 

I held tightly onto that claim ticket and went onto the website where I could type in further information and hopefully track the bag. The place where I was staying was located in an area with poor phone reception. The computer website told me the bag would be delivered by 3:30 p.m the next day. As the next afternoon rolled around, it was going on 3:00 p.m and I was beginning to wonder if the airport, the baggage claim service and all the people it took to make the delivery possible would come through on their promise. 

Soon I got a phone call - but then the call dropped. After about four or five missed calls, I was able to text the driver the address where I was staying. When the knock came on the door, I was excited. There was my bag! I knew by looking at it and the driver that my request had been fulfilled. When the driver saw me, I offered my claim ticket and he said it was unnecessary, since through our repeated efforts to communicate he had deduced that I was his intended recipient.  

How you can tell when God is working in your prayer-life

Now for the point of the story: you and I dear Christian can be certain of God's working in our lives and can know for sure when He has answered our requests. The passage above begins with the truth: "And if we know that He hears us in whatever we ask...". That conditional "if" is based upon the fact relayed in the previous verse of the confidence we have to come to God in prayer. Do we trust God? When we pray to Him, are we confident that He will come thought for us? 

I'll admit, I was nervous about the airline's abilities and at one point was unsure whether I would use them again. But as soon as that bag arrived, all of that was erased. I wonder if that is how we often treat God in prayer? We chew our spiritual fingernails and really wonder if He is trustworthy. When we see answered prayer, we will of course praise the Lord after the fact. But what about before? Moreover, I wonder how often we have experienced answered prayer without even knowing it? 

To the degree with have confidence in God's character will determine how well we can identified answered prayer. Notice what the Apostle John writes in the second half of 1 John 5:14 "....we know that we have the requests which we have asked from Him." The Greek word translated "we know" speaks of "understanding". Henceforth the ability to understand where God is working in relationship to our prayers increases as we "understand" or "know" that He is trustworthy. 

If you and I dear Christian could just see how often God is at work in our lives and works in response to prayers that perhaps we had forgotten about, we would perhaps be not so quick to doubt God the next time we pray. When the answer comes, will you and I recognize it? I hope we will. Unlike the occasional foibles of air travel, God will never leave one detail of our lives unchecked.  We can be sure that His will and purposes will be achieved on His time. We just need to trust Him, so that we can recognize His work in the present and future times to come.  

The need to rest

Psalm 46:10 "Be still, and know that I am God; I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted in the earth!"

Introduction:
Today's post is going to make an important announcement regarding what I've concluded from praying and thinking about needing to rest for a season from blogging. But first, let me say a word about what the scripture says about the necessity of rest in the Christian life. 

Two four letter words: Busy and Rest
I am convinced that in today's Christian world we have two four-letter words, one of which is dirty to God and one of which is dirty to us. The word that we find ourselves saying often to God that is dirty to Him is the word "busy": "I'm too busy to pray" or "I'm too busy too stop and check on so-and-so" or "I'm to busy to sit and listen." One wise saint of God described the word "busy" in acrostic form: "burdened under satan's yoke." Certainly God in His Word warns us of getting too "busy" and not resting or taking time out to pray and seek His face. (Chronicles 7:14; Psalm 46:10; Matthew 11:28-30)

The second four letter word is dirty to us but pleasant to God. That word is "rest". I have noticed lately how when talking to Christians or even in my own activities and thoughts how little room there is for "rest". The idea of taking time out to rest is repulsive to many Christians. Why is that? Let's be honest - we don't like resting in prayer before God because we like control. Scripture abounds with God calling His people to come and rest and spend time with Him in prayer. Rest is something God did after creation and is still doing, affirming His Sovereign control over all he has made. 

Rest is at the core of what it means to be a Christian, since in it we are affirming Christ's Sovereign control over us. It is in the place of prayer in conjunction with God's word that the Christian is once again refreshed and recharged.  Rest is seasonal or weekly. We know there are times and seasons of rest - followed by seasons and times of activity. Both are ordained by God and constitute the rhythm of healthy Christian discipleship.

My need to rest, but to hopefully resume blogging in the near future
To all my readers, blogging has become a major part of my life. However, I really feel inclined to take a season of "rest" from what has become a daily activity for me. There are just those times when "rest" is required, and for me, that time is now. I want to continue to grow in my walk with the Lord and aim to pick up the "proverbial pen" once more in the near future whenever God sees fit and inclines me to become active once again in blogging. I urge readers to explore this blog-site. The goal has been and will always be to provide "growing Christian resources" for people that emphasize the practical, doctrinal and supernatural aspects of the Christian walk. Blessings!